Roomba 805 vs 890


Vacuums are needed in any home, especially if you want to keep your rooms clean at all times stop inhaling the excessive dust. Robotic vacuums are amazing alternatives, as they can do the job alone. Through many robotic vacuum models, the brand that stands out the most is iRobot, as they were able to create efficient and durable models loved by many people. However, there are two that is hard to choose between, which is what led to this guide in the first place.

The battle in this article is for Roomba 805 vs Roomba 890, which are two robotic vacuums that many customers were pleased with. The aim of this article is to compare the two, thus revealing the similarities and differences, so you end up deciding which one of them would suit you the most.
Features

Roomba 805

Roomba 805 has a lot of features that allow it to clean the floors and ensure there’s no particle left on them. First of all, it’s essential to know that it can be scheduled to clean 7x weekly. This scheduling is amazing when you’re too busy or tired and just forget to turn on the machine, or when you’re away from home. Therefore, you don’t have to always be at home to ensure your floors are clean.

It was provided with a Lithium-Ion Battery that is able to deliver up to 3x the battery cycle lifetime.
Moreover, it has an AeroForce 3-Stage Cleaning System which improves the cleaning performance considerably. Add to that the tangle-free extractors which don’t let the hair and debris clog the machine.

What also makes this device great is its Two Dual-Mode Virtual Wall Barriers. This feature manages where your robotic vacuum cleans. It also works on multiple floor types, so no need to worry in that aspect.

Roomba 890

Considering it’s a newer model, it’s only normal that it has advanced technology and some additional features meant to improve its performance.

First of all, the 890 model uses 2 Lithium-Ion Batteries and lasts for about 90 minutes. Due to the auto-docking feature, it’s able to go back to the docking station and recharge by itself. This is useful for when you’re too busy, or you forget to charge it yourself. Its compatibility with Amazon Alexa and Google Assistant also lets you schedule the robot from just anywhere.

It’s provided with cliff detection sensors too. This feature is so useful because, without it, your robotic vacuum would be at risk of falling. As a result, it could receive damage, and that’s the last thing you want to happen, especially after spending money on it.

Read also:  Roomba 960 vs 980

Its power-lifting suction is much stronger compared to the one Roomba 805 has, delivering 5x the suction. This is amazing as it helps the performance by picking up dirt more efficiently, leaving you with cleaner floors. Also, its dual multi-surface rubber brushes can adjust instantly, as well as flex to always be in contact with the floors.

Furthermore, it has premium 3-stage cleaning, which is a system that properly loosens and vacuums the dust, pet hair and dirt from your flooring.

Design

You might not care that much about the design, but it’s important to know what it consists of. After all, certain parts of the design have a word when it comes to performance.

Roomba 805 comes in full black color, while the only splash of color on it is coming from the “CLEAN” button featured in the middle. It also has 4 more buttons with different functions. One of them is for docking, whereas the others are for scheduling, spotting and setting the clock. It looks like the usual robotic vacuums you see in pictures or videos, so there’s not much to say in this regard.

It has a size of 18.2 x 16.5 x 5.5 inches, and a weight of 8.4 pounds.

Our other model, Roomba 890, is a little different. It has a lighter color, even though the surrounding frame is black. The surface contains gray, and in the middle, you can find the same “CLEAN” button.

As for its size, it’s a little bigger than the previous model, respectively 19.2 x 17.2 x 6 inches and 13.4 pounds.

Cleaning Performance

Now we’ve reached the most important part – the cleaning performance. After all, this is why you’re looking to buy a Roomba in the first place isn’t it?

Let’s start with the older model, Roomba 805.

One of the best things about the 805 is its ability to clean under low furniture. That being said, it can effectively clean under your bed, kickboards and more. You don’t have to worry about the brushes getting tangled either, as the tangle-free extractors prevent that from happening.

It contains AeroForce High-Efficiency filters which will be amazing for those suffering from allergies. This filtration system captures up to 99% of pollen, dust and any other particle as small as 10 microns.

Its auto-docking allows the robot to go and recharge by itself once the battery is too low. That said, even if you’re not at home and the robotic vacuum starts its performance, it won’t die in the middle of the work. Instead, it will go charge its batteries and get ready for the next day.

Also, it has iAdapt Navigation, which is a system using sensors to help the machine navigate your rooms properly.

The 890 model has an overall advanced performance, as expected from a newer model. Therefore, the Roomba 805 vs 890 battle is pretty intense.

Read also:  Roomba 675 vs 690

It can be scheduled just like its counterpart, except it has compatibility with Google Assistant and Amazon Alexa, meaning you can schedule it even from afar.

Its High-Efficiency filters can capture as much as 99% of dust, allergens, pollen and any particle of only 10 microns. As such, it can be a great companion for those suffering from allergies and are tired of wiping their nose and sneezing.

Dirt Detection has also been implemented within this model in order to ensure it focuses on areas that have accumulated more dirt too. In other words, it won’t miss these spots.

It has improved suction, which is a plus for any vacuum cleaner. Some dirt is harder to remove compared to the other, which is why improper suction won’t help loosen it. The powered suction will be a huge help. Additionally, the Premium 3-Stage Cleaning System also helps loosen the dirt, pet hair and dust from the floor, making the job much easier.

Pros and Cons

Models Pros Cons
Roomba 805
Works on multiple types of floors Can get stuck in some messy areas
Can be emptied and cleaned easily It can damage furniture if not careful
It has scheduling Its filtration is not as good as HEPA filtration
Has fast charging It only runs 90 minutes at a time
Is not too noisy
Roomba 890
Contains tangle-free brushes Can be a little noisy
Has HEPA filters Can’t clean multiple rooms in one go
Has an increased suction power Is pricier
Can be controlled from afar
Full bin indicator on the iRobot home app
Has cliff-detection sensors

Roomba 890

  • Contains tangle-free brushes
  • Has HEPA filters
  • Has an increased suction power
  • Can be controlled from afar
  • Full bin indicator on the iRobot home app
  • Has cliff-detection sensors
  • Can be a little noisy
  • Can’t clean multiple rooms in one go
  • Is pricier

Roomba 805 vs 890 Comparison Table

Model Roomba 805 Roomba 890
Image
Size 18.2 x 16.5 x 5.5 inches 19.2 x 17.2 x 6 inches
Weight 8.4 pounds 13.4 pounds
Battery 1 Lithium-Ion Battery 2 Lithium-Ion Batteries
Wi-Fi
No
Yes
Power Normal 5x stronger
Remote Control
No
Yes

(through app control)

Floor Types Most floor types All indoor floor types

Roomba 805 vs 890 Price



Final Thoughts

The Roomba 805 vs 890 battle is intense, but in the end, it’s clear that the 890 is the winner. With better suction power, dirt detection and better filtration, as well as remote control, it’s a better option. At the same time, the 805 may be a better possibility for those with lower income.
If you’re looking for a robotic vacuum cleaner, one of these models might be what you’re looking for.

You May Also Like

About the Author: Steve Walker

Steve Walker is online blogger from Charleston, SC. His passion is internet marketing, it, home appliances and writing about it. If you wish to collaborate do not hesitate to contact! :)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *